Skip to main content

Hit by ransomware? Isolate affected systems now. Do not reboot or reformat.

SheMo Noransom舍末无勒

Ransomware family

C3RB3R Ransomware Decryption & Data Recovery

  • Inactive
  • High
  • No public decryptor

C3RB3R is ransomware that appends .LOCK3D (letter O) or .L0CK3D (zero) and drops a read-me3.txt note, with victims on Windows, Linux and NAS. It first appeared on home NAS devices in late 2022 and from November 2023 was mass-deployed through the Atlassian Confluence flaw CVE-2023-22518, hitting many Linux servers in China. Attribution is disputed: 360 and SentinelOne call it a new Cerber variant, while Red Canary and BleepingComputer's researchers see it as built from leaked Conti code.

First seen
2022-12
File extensions
.LOCK3D .L0CK3D
Ransom notes
read-me3.txt
Affected platforms
Windows / Linux / NAS storage

Family profile

File extensions
  • .LOCK3D
  • .L0CK3D
Ransom notes
  • read-me3.txt
Contact patterns
  • The note is headed "C3RB3R INSTRUCTIONS" and sends victims to a per-victim .onion payment page via Tor Browser
  • In the 2023 Confluence wave every note pointed to j3qxmk6g5sk3zw62i2yhjnwmhm55rfz47fdyfkhaithlpelfjdokdxad.onion
  • Payment in Bitcoin for "C3rb3r Decryptor", with one free test decryption; the note claims data was stolen and will be sold on the dark web if unpaid
  • No mailbox and no public leak site
Aliases / versions
LOCK3D 勒索病毒(字母 O)、L0CK3D 勒索病毒(数字 0)、Cerber 新变种(360、SentinelOne 等厂商口径)、C3rb3r Decryptor(勒索信中的「解密软件」名)
First seen
2022-12
Status
Inactive
Operational status
Currently dormant
Threat level
High
Affected platforms
  • Windows
  • Linux
  • NAS storage
Tags
  • Legacy family
  • Exploits vulnerabilities
  • Double extortion
  • Targets NAS
Decryptor
No public decryptor

There is no free public decryptor for C3RB3R (.LOCK3D / .L0CK3D). No More Ransom does not list it, and no vendor or law-enforcement agency has published keys. Sample analysis by Red Canary and 360 shows files are encrypted with ChaCha and the keys protected with algorithms such as AES and RC4, so nothing can be reversed without the operators' private key.

The note's claim that "any third-party recovery software will be fatal for your files" is a pressure tactic; it does not make backups, snapshots or database repair unusable. Be wary instead of so-called "L0CK3D decryptors" that appear online: test them on offline copies only, never on original disks.

Sources

Overview

"Lock3d" refers to this family. Searches for "Lock3d ransomware" or "L0CK3D extension" all point to the suffix C3RB3R leaves on encrypted files; different samples of the same family spell it with the letter O or the digit zero.

Timeline.

  • December 2022: the first help requests appeared on the BleepingComputer forum, from a victim whose TerraMaster NAS external drive had every file renamed with .LOCK3D.
  • November 2023: Atlassian disclosed CVE-2023-22518, an authorization flaw in Confluence Data Center and Server, on 31 October, and the first in-the-wild attacks appeared on 1 November. Rapid7, Red Canary, Huntress and SentinelOne reported the flaw being used to deploy C3RB3R; Atlassian confirmed ransomware attacks on 6 November and raised the CVSS score from 9.1 to 10. In the same period 360 received many reports from Linux users in China whose files now ended in .L0CK3D.
  • January to April 2024: Arctic Wolf reported C3RB3R being deployed through a second Confluence flaw, CVE-2023-22527, mainly against Linux servers, and Cado Security published its analysis of the Linux variant in April.
  • Since 2025: we found no new public incident reports, and trackers list the family as inactive. The code and tooling are in circulation, though, and servers with the old flaws unpatched can still be hit, so this page stays in service for response.

Attribution is disputed, and this page records both readings. 360 and SentinelOne call it a new Cerber variant, with SentinelOne noting that Cerber has existed in phases since 2016 and operated as a semi-private RaaS since around 2020. The other side carries weight too: ransomware researchers on the BleepingComputer forum state plainly that "C3RB3R is not a new variant of Cerber", describing it as based on leaked Conti v3 code, and note that genuine Cerber used .cerber-style extensions. Red Canary likewise assesses the sample as likely derived from leaked Conti material, its mutex being shared with several Conti-derived families. Rapid7 adds that the attacks were not necessarily the original Cerber operation but more likely someone reusing leaked code to "make a quick buck". For a victim the outcome is the same: no public decryptor exists, and response must be driven by the sample in hand.

How to identify it

Extension. An uppercase .LOCK3D (letter O) or .L0CK3D (zero) is appended to the full original name, so 1.jpg becomes 1.jpg.LOCK3D or 1.jpg.L0CK3D. Do not confuse it with TellYouThePass's lowercase .locked or the underscore-prefixed ._locked; those are entirely different families.

Ransom note. Every encrypted directory gets a read-me3.txt (the number in the name may vary) headed "C3RB3R INSTRUCTIONS". It tells victims to install Tor Browser, visit an .onion payment page and buy "C3rb3r Decryptor", and claims data was downloaded and will be sold on the dark web if unpaid.

Windows host indicators (360, Red Canary, SentinelOne):

  • The payload lands as C:\Windows\Temp\svcPrvinit.exe (360's sample MD5 7415347d5ea5f0db29ec95a4a61aba90), runs silently with the -b 9 argument and deletes itself afterwards.
  • Mutex hsfjuukjzloqu28oajh727190.
  • Shadow copies are deleted one by one with wmic.exe (shadowcopy where "ID='{…}'" delete).
  • Confluence's Tomcat / Java process spawns cmd and PowerShell.

Linux host indicators (Cado, SentinelOne): three UPX-packed 64-bit ELF payloads (a stager, a log checker and the encryptor), with the stager deleting itself after running; a Python script reads addresses from /tmp/lru, downloads a program named qnetd and that launches the encryptor.

Network indicators. Download servers in the 2023 wave: 193.176.179.41, 193.43.72.11 and 45.145.6.112.

Bottom line. A .LOCK3D / .L0CK3D extension plus read-me3.txt plus "C3RB3R INSTRUCTIONS" confirms the family. If the server also runs Confluence, the entry point is all but settled.

Infection vectors

Confluence flaws (the main entry).

  • CVE-2023-22518 (improper authorization, CVSS 10): an unauthenticated attacker can submit a "restore from backup" request to /json/setup-restore.action, reset Confluence and create an administrator account, then upload a web-shell plugin for command execution. Every unpatched version of Confluence Data Center and Server is affected.
  • CVE-2023-22527 (template injection leading to remote code execution): Arctic Wolf reported attackers using it in early 2024 to deploy C3RB3R, mainly against Linux servers, alongside cryptominers and remote-access tools.

Once they have execution, the operators use PowerShell (Windows) or Python (Linux) scripts to work out whether a proxy is needed, then pull the encryptor from a download server and run it.

NAS and external storage. The first victims in late 2022 were TerraMaster NAS users, mostly on devices still running the older TOS 4.1 / 4.2.

Network shares. The Windows build walks and encrypts every reachable SMB share, so one compromised Confluence server can take file-server shares mapped to it down with it.

Encryption behavior

Algorithms. Red Canary and 360 report that files are encrypted with ChaCha (a refinement of Salsa20), consistent with the last Conti build; the sample also carries AES and RC4 for steps such as protecting keys. Encryption is multithreaded and covers local disks and network shares.

Destroying recovery paths. After encryption the Windows build deletes shadow copies one by one with wmic, then deletes itself.

The Linux build is limited by permissions. Cado's analysis notes that the encryptor walks from the filesystem root (/usr, /var and so on), but Confluence usually runs as the low-privilege confluence user, so only files that user can write get encrypted - Confluence attachments, indexes and local data, plus other directories it owns. System files and other users' data are often intact, which is the first thing to establish when assessing a Linux host.

Assess before you act

Recoverability assessment

There is no decryption route for C3RB3R. We do not pay ransoms and do not negotiate on a client's behalf; our work is technical recovery and forensics. The paths below are ordered by viability, with actual yields determined on site.

1) Public decryptor: none.

2) On Linux, scope the damage first. Because the encryptor runs with the confluence user's permissions, check which directories were actually encrypted. Databases running under their own accounts (for example MySQL or PostgreSQL data directories not owned by the confluence user) are often untouched and can be exported directly.

3) Confluence's own recovery sources. Confluence's scheduled backup zips (by default under backups in the application home directory), database-level backups and snapshots, and snapshots of the volume holding attachments. The vulnerability itself abuses the "restore from backup" feature, so confirm the operators did not replace backup files before restoring from them.

4) Windows hosts and shares. Shadow copies are usually gone, but it is worth checking a read-only image for leftovers from failed deletions; file-server snapshots and offline and offsite backups are the main sources.

5) NAS. Disconnect it and stop all writes, then check the NAS snapshot feature (supported on newer systems such as TerraMaster TOS 5) and external backups; try anything only on copies.

6) Exfiltration assessment. The note claims data was downloaded. No public leak site does not mean the data is safe; bound the exfiltration from egress traffic and logs.

We deliver a verifiable assessment and a clearly bounded recovery scope, and never promise "100% decryption".

Our response plan

Hit by C3RB3R ransomware? What to do

  1. Containment and evidence preservation

    Take Confluence off the internet at once, isolate affected hosts and NAS devices, and disconnect mapped network shares. Do not reboot or reinstall. Take read-only images of affected volumes, export Confluence access logs (watch for /json/setup-restore.action and newly installed plugins), Tomcat logs, system logs and egress records, and keep three to five encrypted files plus the original read-me3.txt.

  2. Confirm the family and the encryption scope

    Confirm the family from the .LOCK3D / .L0CK3D extension, read-me3.txt and "C3RB3R INSTRUCTIONS". On Windows check for svcPrvinit.exe, the mutex and shadow-copy deletion; on Linux establish which user the encryptor ran as, which directories were encrypted and whether database directories are intact. Sweep other Confluence instances on the same network and any mounted shares.

  3. Recoverability and exfiltration assessment

    Inventory Confluence scheduled backups, database backups and snapshots, file-server and NAS snapshots and offline backups, confirm the backups were not replaced, and run sample restores of critical data; in parallel bound the exfiltration from egress traffic and logs. Execution starts after the written assessment.

  4. Rebuild and recovery

    Rebuild compromised Confluence hosts rather than cleaning them: the operators had administrator rights and installed a web-shell plugin. Restore data onto a new instance running a fixed version, keep original disks read-only, and verify spaces, pages and attachments after restoring.

  5. Attribution, hardening and handover

    Reconstruct the intrusion: which flaw, when it was exploited, and which admin accounts and plugins were added. Hardening: upgrade Confluence to versions fixing CVE-2023-22518 and CVE-2023-22527 and keep the admin console off the internet; run Confluence and the database under separate accounts; update NAS firmware and close unnecessary internet-facing services; build backups with offline copies and rehearse restores. Close with an incident report and handover checklist.

Risk warning

What not to do

  • Do not reboot or reinstall affected servers; logs and disk artefacts establish the entry point and the exfiltration scope.
  • Do not put Confluence back on the internet before patching; the flaw can be exploited again.
  • Do not restore straight from Confluence's existing backups: the flaw abuses the restore-from-backup feature itself, so first confirm the backup files were not replaced.
  • Do not trust online "L0CK3D decryptors"; test any tool on offline copies only.
  • Do not visit the .onion page in the note or pay the ransom on your own.

Emergency response

Data already encrypted? Stop and let an engineer look first

We do not pay ransoms and we do not negotiate with attackers. Engineers run a free assessment first, then propose a recovery plan and a firm quote.

Related scenarios

Similar families

FAQ

C3RB3R Frequently asked questions

  • Files now end in .LOCK3D or .L0CK3D - what ransomware is this?

    This is C3RB3R ransomware, which 360 and others also call a new Cerber variant. Samples spell the suffix with the letter O (.LOCK3D) or the digit zero (.L0CK3D), and every directory gets a read-me3.txt note headed "C3RB3R INSTRUCTIONS". Its most common entry points are the Atlassian Confluence flaws CVE-2023-22518 and CVE-2023-22527, and early victims included TerraMaster NAS users. Do not confuse it with lowercase .locked (TellYouThePass).

  • Can .L0CK3D files be decrypted?

    Not today. No public decryptor exists; files are encrypted with ChaCha and the keys protected separately, so nothing can be reversed without the operators' private key. Decryption is not the only route, though: on Linux the encryptor only has the confluence user's permissions, so database directories are often intact, and Confluence's scheduled backups, database backups and storage or NAS snapshots are all worth checking. We scope the encryption first, then assess what can be recovered and from where.

  • Is C3RB3R the same Cerber as in 2016?

    Sources disagree. 360 and SentinelOne call it a new Cerber variant, while ransomware researchers on the BleepingComputer forum state plainly that it is not a Cerber variant but based on leaked Conti v3 code; genuine 2016 Cerber used .cerber-style extensions. Red Canary also assesses the sample as likely derived from leaked Conti material, and Rapid7 notes the attacks were not necessarily the original Cerber operation. None of this changes the response: under either reading there is no public decryptor, and the sample in hand decides.

  • We have patched Confluence - do we still need to investigate?

    Yes. In-the-wild attacks began a day after CVE-2023-22518 was disclosed, so the instance may have been compromised before patching. Check access logs for requests to /json/setup-restore.action, new administrator accounts and plugins (such as a web.shell.Plugin), records of Tomcat or Java spawning cmd, PowerShell or Python, and suspicious programs under /tmp. Instances confirmed as compromised should be rebuilt, and the admin console should not face the internet directly.