Ransomware family
Weaxor Ransomware Decryption & Data Recovery
- Active
- Critical
- No public decryptor
Weaxor emerged in late 2024 as a same-lineage successor to Mallox, continuing its focus on MS SQL Server and exposed web services. It appends .rox, .weax or .wxx and drops a RECOVERY INFO.txt note. It has led infection volume in China through 2025 and 2026 (45.45% in July 2026, 65.74% in August 2026) and has no public decryptor.
- First seen
- 2024-10
- File extensions
- .rox .weax .wxx
- Ransom notes
- RECOVERY INFO.txt
- Affected platforms
- Windows / Linux / Databases
Family profile
- File extensions
- .rox
- .weax
- .wxx
- .roxaew
- .wax
- Ransom notes
- RECOVERY INFO.txt
- Contact patterns
- Tor negotiation page (link inside the note)
- Disposable mailboxes (tuta.com, anche.no; a primary and a backup address)
- Note offers 3 free test decryptions (under 5MB each, no databases or backups)
- Aliases / versions
- Mallox 改名版、TargetCompany 同源家族、rox 勒索病毒、weax 勒索病毒
- First seen
- 2024-10
- Status
- Active
- Threat level
- Critical
- Affected platforms
- Windows
- Linux
- Databases
- Tags
- Prevalent in China
- Targets databases
- Exploits vulnerabilities
- Rebranded
- Active
Weaxor currently has no free public decryptor, and no entry exists for it in No More Ransom or in vendor decryptor libraries.
A common misconception needs correcting: Weaxor is widely regarded as a rebrand or same-lineage successor to Mallox (TargetCompany) from late 2024, which leads victims to try Avast's Mallox decryptor on .rox or .weax files — that does not work. Avast's tool only covers Mallox files encrypted between 2023 and early 2024 with extensions such as .mallox, .malox and .bitenc; the operators fixed the exploited cryptographic flaw around March 2024, and Weaxor uses the fixed implementation.
When you encounter .rox, .weax or .wxx, go straight to backup inventory and database repair feasibility rather than spending the response window on decryptors.
Latest activity
360's August 2026 landscape report puts Weaxor first in China at 65.74% of infections, far ahead of BrzCrypt (11.11%) and LockBit (5.56%). Victims are mostly Windows Server 2012/2008 hosts, and 57.52% ran no security software.
Sources360's July 2026 report (Weaxor first at 45.45%) documents new TTPs: PowerShell payload loading with process injection, repeated loading of vulnerable drivers for kernel-level EDR evasion, and AnyDesk implanted after database brute force.
Sources
Overview
Weaxor was first identified in late 2024 and is widely assessed in public research as a rebrand or same-lineage successor to Mallox (TargetCompany): Microsoft SQL Server remains the core target, and the delivery chain, obfuscation techniques and operating style carry over, but with a new brand name, new extensions and a fixed encryption implementation.
The China picture matters most: 360's 2025 landscape reports place Weaxor first by domestic infection volume in several months — around 40% in January, 35.97% in March, 28.27% in May, 52.24% in June and 38.06% in October. In other words, Weaxor has displaced Mallox as one of the highest-volume families in China; the trend strengthened through 2026, reaching 45.45% in July and 65.74% in August — the highest share recorded in 360's monthly reports. Technically it is more elaborate than Mallox: multi-layer obfuscated initial loaders, PowerShell and batch script delivery, process injection, AMSI bypass and Cobalt Strike shellcode. Its attack surface is widening too, with research documenting exploitation of internet-facing web service vulnerabilities including the flaw tracked as React2Shell (CVE-2025-55182) for initial access.
How to identify it
Extensions: .rox is the most common, alongside .weax and .wxx, with 360's domestic reports also recording .wax and .roxaew.
Ransom note: RECOVERY INFO.txt — the most reliable indicator. It directs the victim to download the Tor browser and visit a given link, provides two anonymous mailboxes (tuta.com and anche.no domains are common) as a fallback, and offers free test decryption of three files up to 5 MB each, explicitly excluding databases and backups.
Intrusion artefacts (the key to the entry point): on the MS SQL Server track, many failed sa logons followed by a success, xp_cmdshell enabled or commands run through CLR/OLE components, and sqlservr.exe spawning PowerShell or unusual executables; on the web service track, requests against a specific vulnerable path in middleware logs followed by web-shell access.
Distinguishing it from Mallox: Mallox uses FILE RECOVERY.txt-style notes with .mallox or .bitenc extensions; Weaxor uses RECOVERY INFO.txt with .rox, .weax or .wxx. This determines whether the Avast decryptor could apply.
Infection vectors
Weaxor inherits Mallox's core routes and extends them.
1. Brute-forced MS SQL Server credentials (the main entry point): scan the internet for instances with port 1433 open and run dictionary and brute-force attacks against sa and other privileged accounts; after a successful logon, enable xp_cmdshell or abuse CLR/OLE components to execute system commands and download the payload. Many Chinese manufacturing, retail and trading companies expose database ports directly with an sa password unchanged for years, which keeps supplying targets. Monitoring in 2026 records a variation: some builds do not encrypt immediately after a successful database logon, but first install a remote-access tool such as AnyDesk and let an operator deploy the payload by hand — so investigation cannot be limited to the processes around the encryption timestamp.
2. Internet-facing web service vulnerabilities: research has documented Weaxor exploiting flaws including the one tracked as React2Shell (CVE-2025-55182) for initial access. This route resembles TellYouThePass — track public disclosure and mass-deploy against exposed assets. Weak RDP credentials and malicious email attachments are also seen.
3. Kernel-level evasion: 360's 2026 monthly reports describe the chain loading its payload through PowerShell and injecting it into a system process, then loading several different vulnerable drivers in turn to fight security software in the kernel (a BYOVD-style technique). Incident response should therefore check driver-load records and remote-access tool installations alongside the encryptor itself; those artefacts often reconstruct the intrusion better than the ransomware binary does.
Encryption behavior
Weaxor retains the Mallox lineage's hybrid scheme (symmetric encryption of file contents with asymmetric key protection) but uses the implementation that came after the cryptographic flaw was fixed. This is decisive: Avast could publish a Mallox decryptor precisely because builds before March 2024 had an exploitable weakness; once fixed, subsequent builds including Weaxor offer no such shortcut.
Database-related behaviour (the core of Chinese cases): it terminates SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle and backup-agent services; explicitly targets database and backup files (.mdf, .ldf, .bak, .trn, .dbf, .ibd); deletes volume shadow copies and restore points; and encrypts local disks, mapped network drives and reachable shares. Evasion through obfuscated loading, process injection and AMSI bypass complicates forensics and means residual payloads and persistence must be fully removed before recovery.
On large-file handling: public sources give no consistent account across builds, so testing is required — take .mdf, .ldf, .dbf and .ibd files and large archives, analyse the distribution and stride of encrypted blocks, and only then judge repair feasibility. Do not extrapolate from Mallox.
Assess before you act
Recoverability assessment
There is no free public decryptor, and Avast's Mallox decryptor does not apply. That tool only covers Mallox files encrypted between 2023 and early 2024 with extensions such as .mallox, .malox and .bitenc; the operators fixed the exploited flaw and Weaxor runs the fixed implementation.
1. Backups, snapshots and shadow copies The primary path. Weaxor deletes shadow copies and encrypts backups on the same machine, but common survivors include standalone backup servers outside the same credential scope, offline media and tape, NAS-native snapshots, cloud object-storage version history with object lock, hypervisor snapshots and off-site DR copies. In database cases, also check log shipping, Always On secondaries and read-only replicas.
2. Structure-level repair of database files (the core of Weaxor cases) Most Chinese cases involve encrypted databases. Where large files are only partially encrypted, .mdf/.ldf, .dbf and .ibd files retain a meaningful proportion of intact data pages, enabling page-level damage mapping, system-table and allocation repair, table-level extraction and delta reconstruction from logs and upstream documents. If encryption is full, the repair path does not exist and we say so. Coverage is given per database and per table.
3. Unencrypted copies and hosts never touched Downstream warehouses, report exports, read-only replicas, ETL staging tables and partner reconciliation data frequently retain usable data; servers outside the same credential scope, without mapped shares, or powered off at the time are usually intact and can serve as a baseline.
We do not pay ransoms, do not negotiate for clients, and never promise that every file can be decrypted or restored. One further caution: Weaxor runs no public leak site and has no brand reputation at stake, so the risk of paying without receiving a working decryptor is comparatively higher.
Our response plan
Hit by Weaxor ransomware? What to do
Step 1: Containment and evidence preservation
Immediately remove public mappings of port 1433 (and 3306, 1521, 3389), cut external access and internal SMB reachability for affected servers, and disable sa and any other compromised privileged accounts. If the database service was killed, do not repeatedly try to start it — repeated attempts can further damage file structures.
Because Weaxor uses multi-layer obfuscated loading, process injection and AMSI bypass, residual payloads are hard to spot, so forensics must be thorough: SQL Server error logs and logon auditing, records of xp_cmdshell being enabled, child processes of sqlservr.exe, web middleware access logs where the entry point was a web flaw, PowerShell and batch scripts written to disk, scheduled task and service inventories, memory images from still-running hosts, the original RECOVERY INFO.txt notes, encrypted samples of varying type and size, and matching unencrypted originals.
Preserve a complete file listing and timestamps for the database directories as well. Do not reinstall, do not reformat, and do not attempt repairs on original disks.
Step 2: Family identification and locating the entry point
Family determination: Weaxor is identified by the RECOVERY INFO.txt note together with .rox, .weax or .wxx extensions, and must be separated clearly from Mallox (FILE RECOVERY.txt and similar, with .mallox or .bitenc). This distinction decides whether the Avast decryptor could apply — it does not for Weaxor, and settling it immediately saves time otherwise spent hunting for tools.
Entry point: Weaxor has two main routes and it is essential to establish which, or the environment will be breached again after recovery.
- Database route: reconstruct the brute-force timeline from SQL Server error logs and confirm which account succeeded and how commands were executed.
- Web vulnerability route: reconstruct the exploit requests from middleware logs, identify the component and version abused, and enumerate every web shell and persistence mechanism.
Encryption analysis: sample database files, large archives and ordinary documents to determine whether encryption is partial or full, the block stride, and where damaged structures sit. This decides whether Step 3 can offer database repair. Residual components left by process injection and AMSI bypass are audited at the same time.
Step 3: Recoverability assessment and recovery planning
State plainly that no public decryptor exists and that Avast's Mallox tool does not apply, then prioritise around the databases:
- Backup path: verify the recovery point and integrity of standalone backup machines, offline media, NAS snapshots, cloud version history, hypervisor snapshots, log shipping and Always On secondaries.
- Repair path: sample .mdf/.ldf, .dbf and .ibd files to map page- and block-level damage; give table-level coverage estimates where encryption is partial and state honestly where it is full.
- Replay path: determine the time range that transaction logs, archive logs, upstream systems and paper documents can reconstruct.
- Side-channel data: downstream warehouses, report exports, read-only replicas, ETL staging tables and reconciliation data.
- Confirmed unrecoverable: listed explicitly so the business can plan re-entry.
The plan specifies the delivery sequence — usually core operational databases and live transaction tables first, historical data afterwards — plus per-batch verification and expected timing.
Step 4: Recovery execution
Execution happens in a clean environment where the vulnerability is patched and web shells and residual payloads have been removed, working throughout on read-only images and copies.
- Database repair: where encryption is confirmed partial, map page-level damage in SQL Server, repair system tables and allocation structures and extract table by table; for Oracle, combine datafile header repair with archive-log application; for MySQL, process .ibd files individually and rebuild the dictionary.
- Delta reconstruction: replay unaffected transaction logs, archive logs, upstream transaction feeds and documents to push the recovery point as close to the encryption moment as possible.
- Backup restoration: validate backup integrity and screen for embedded payloads in isolation first, then restore in priority order.
- Files and shares: restore in batches by department priority.
- Side-channel reload: import reconstructed reports and reconciliation data back into the system by business period.
Each batch is reconciled: table-level record counts against the business system, sampled key documents verified, and application connectivity and functionality tested. The recovery environment stays isolated from production until residual payloads and backdoors are ruled out.
Step 5: Attribution, hardening and sign-off
The investigation report states: the initial entry point (database brute force or web exploitation), the timeline, which account succeeded or which component version was abused, the command-execution mechanism, the payload delivery chain, residues left by process injection and AMSI bypass, lateral scope, why backups failed, and whether data was exfiltrated.
Verifiable hardening checklist:
- Keep database ports off the internet: remove public mappings of 1433/3306/1521 and route remote access through VPN with enforced multi-factor authentication.
- Set strong passwords with source-IP restrictions on sa, root and other privileged accounts, disable dangerous extensions such as xp_cmdshell, and run the database service under a low-privilege account.
- Web asset management: inventory every internet-facing web service and middleware version and establish an emergency patch process for critical vulnerabilities — Weaxor follows new disclosures with mass deployment.
- Segment database hosts from the general business network and separate databases from application servers.
- Move backups to offline/off-site plus immutable storage, physically separate database backups from data files, and run regular real restore drills.
- Deploy EDR across database and web servers with a closed alert loop for failed logons, xp_cmdshell being enabled, application processes spawning children, and anomalous PowerShell.
The engagement closes with an incident report and a hardening sign-off checklist.
Risk warning
What not to do
- Do not use Avast's Mallox decryptor on .rox / .weax / .wxx files. It only covers Mallox builds before March 2024, does nothing for Weaxor, and the attempt writes unnecessarily to original disks.
- Do not repeatedly try to start the encrypted database instance, and do not run DBCC repair or force-attach against .mdf/.ldf files — those writes destroy the structures repair depends on.
- Do not attempt recovery on original disks. Image the volumes holding the database files read-only and perform all analysis and repair on copies.
- Do not reconnect production to the network before residual payloads and persistence are removed. Weaxor uses process injection and AMSI bypass, so remnants are easy to miss and re-encryption risk is high.
- Do not delete the RECOVERY INFO.txt notes, encrypted samples or SQL Server error logs; they are the core evidence for family identification, entry-point analysis and encryption analysis.
- Do not pay through the Tor page or the note's mailboxes on your own. Weaxor runs no public leak site and has no brand reputation at stake, so the risk of paying without receiving a working decryptor is comparatively higher.
Emergency response
Data already encrypted? Stop and let an engineer look first
We do not pay ransoms and we do not negotiate with attackers. Engineers run a free assessment first, then propose a recovery plan and a firm quote.
Related scenarios
SQL Server Database Encrypted by Ransomware
When SQL Server .mdf / .ldf files are encrypted, the ERP and inventory systems built on them — Yonyou U8, Kingdee K/3, Guanjiapo, Suda — stop completely. This page covers evidence handling, how we judge whether page-level repair is viable, and the conditions for backup-plus-log restore.
Database Encrypted by Ransomware
When database files are encrypted, every business system that depends on them stops at once. This page explains how we triage an encrypted database, how recoverability is assessed, and when file repair, backup-plus-log restore, or rebuild is the right path.
MySQL / MariaDB Database Encrypted by Ransomware
When MySQL's ibdata1, .ibd and .frm files are encrypted, websites, online stores, OA and other web workloads all go down. Most cases start at a web application flaw or an exposed management panel. This page covers what InnoDB's file layout means for recovery, the value of binlogs, and the correct sequence.
File Servers and NAS Encrypted by Ransomware
When shared folders on a file server or NAS are encrypted, drawings, contracts, archives, quotations and design sources all become unusable at once — and mapped drives spread the impact to every endpoint. This page covers how to gauge spread, what shadow copies and snapshots realistically offer, and how to sequence recovery by business value.
Related industries
Manufacturing Ransomware Response and Recovery
Ransomware in manufacturing hits information systems and production cadence at the same time: with ERP down there are no orders, with MES down there is no schedule, and an encrypted drawing library takes the process documentation for an entire product line with it. This page covers the asset profile, recovery priorities and targeted defences.
Retail and E-commerce Ransomware Response
In retail and e-commerce, ransomware translates directly into an inability to sell: order systems, membership, POS and warehouse fulfilment stop together and losses accrue by the hour. This page covers the sector's attack patterns, a recovery order built around the order-to-fulfilment chain, and handling of member data exposure.
Logistics and Supply Chain Ransomware Response
Logistics is acutely time-sensitive: when TMS, WMS, dispatch and sorting systems stop, goods pile up in warehouses and on routes immediately, and the effect propagates up and down the supply chain. This page covers the sector's threat profile, a recovery order built around goods movement, and hardening for EDI-interconnected environments.
Similar families
- Some versions decryptable
Mallox
Mallox (also known as TargetCompany) breaks in mainly through brute-forced MS SQL Server credentials, targets database servers specifically, and has a Linux/ESXi variant. Files encrypted between 2023 and early 2024 may be decryptable with Avast's free tool; later builds have no public decryption method.
- No public decryptor
TellYouThePass
TellYouThePass is the archetypal vulnerability-driven ransomware family in China, mass-deployed against internet-facing ERP, OA, finance and middleware systems. It appends .locked and hits both Windows and Linux servers. No public decryptor exists.
- Some versions decryptable
LockBit
LockBit is one of the largest ransomware-as-a-service operations in the world. Despite the 2024 law-enforcement takedown it returned as LockBit 5.0, with working Windows, Linux and VMware ESXi payloads, and it remains one of the most frequently seen families in China.
Related questions
- First response
What should I do if I've been hit by ransomware?
Isolate first and keep the power on: unplug the network cable or turn off Wi-Fi, but do not reboot, format, delete the ransom note or contact the attackers. Then work in order: confirm it is ransomware and whether it is still spreading, preserve the note, encrypted samples and logs, identify the family, inventory backups and snapshots to assess recovery paths, and report the incident. Do not reconnect restored systems until the entry point is closed, credentials are rotated and backdoors are removed.
- First response
What should we do when a server is hit by ransomware?
Isolate first and do not reboot: cut the affected server off at the switch or in the cloud security group, but leave it running. Then snapshot or image the system and data disks, keep the ransom note and encrypted samples, and check read-only whether shadow copies, cloud snapshots and backups survived. If several servers are down, set a restore order by business dependency, and bring nothing back online until the entry point is closed and every credential has been changed. What can be recovered depends on the family, the encryption mode and the backups.
- Systems & software
What should we do when Guanjiapo or Suda account sets are encrypted by ransomware?
Isolate the server holding the account sets from the network but keep it powered on. Do not reinstall the accounting software, restore an account set over the original disk, or run decryptors from the internet. Guanjiapo, Suda, Chanjet T+ and T3, Kingdee KIS Professional and similar products mostly keep account sets in SQL Server, with built-in automatic backups on the same machine, so both tend to be encrypted together. How much comes back depends on the family and how it encrypted, whether a clean backup exists beyond that server, and whether the database files were only partly encrypted. After recovery, reconcile stock, receivables and payables line by line, and close the entry point before going back online.
- Aftermath
Why do we keep getting hit by ransomware, and how do we stop it for good?
Repeat infections are rarely bad luck; the previous incident was almost always left unfinished. The real entry point was never found or never closed, accounts, scheduled tasks, remote-access tools or web shells left by the attacker are still there, credentials were only partly changed, or systems were restored from backups that already contained the backdoor. Environments that paid, or whose access was resold, also get revisited. The fix follows an order: forensics to find the real entry point, a rebuild-or-clean decision, closing the entry and removing persistence, a full credential reset, then verified hardening and ongoing monitoring.
FAQ
Weaxor Frequently asked questions
Can .rox / .weax files be decrypted?
No free public decryptor exists. .rox, .weax and .wxx belong to the Weaxor family, and neither No More Ransom nor vendor libraries list a tool.
One misconception is worth flagging: Weaxor is widely regarded as a rebrand or same-lineage successor to Mallox, which leads victims to try Avast's Mallox decryptor on .rox files — that does not work. The Avast tool only covers files encrypted between 2023 and early 2024 with extensions such as .mallox, .malox and .bitenc; the operators fixed the exploited cryptographic flaw around March 2024, and Weaxor runs the fixed implementation.
So with .rox or .weax, go straight to the realistic paths: inventory standalone backups and offline media, check NAS and hypervisor snapshots, run repair feasibility tests on the database files, and map side-channel copies such as downstream reports and read-only replicas.
How are Weaxor and Mallox related? Is the response the same?
Public research broadly treats Weaxor as a rebrand or same-lineage successor to Mallox (TargetCompany) from late 2024: MS SQL Server remains the core target and the delivery chain and operating style carry over, but with a new brand name, new extensions and a fixed encryption implementation.
The overall response approach is the same — databases first, backup inventory, structural repair, log replay — with one decisive difference: decryptability differs completely. Some Mallox builds from 2023 to early 2024 are covered by Avast's free decryptor; Weaxor has no public tool at all. Family identification therefore rests on the notes: Mallox uses FILE RECOVERY.txt or HOW TO BACK FILES.txt, Weaxor uses RECOVERY INFO.txt.
The other difference is the entry point: alongside continued MS SQL Server targeting, Weaxor has been documented exploiting internet-facing web service vulnerabilities such as React2Shell (CVE-2025-55182), so attribution must examine both the database and web routes.
Weaxor encrypted our SQL Server — can the database be recovered?
There is room to recover, but assess in order and without promising coverage.
Backups first: standalone backup servers outside the same credential scope, offline media, off-site DR, log-shipping or Always On secondaries, read-only replicas, and historical .bak files in unmapped paths. Any usable one beats repair. Chinese cases frequently feature a local backup encrypted alongside production while a forgotten export job saves the day, so check each item.
Repair next: Weaxor's encryption method must be verified empirically. Depending on how encryption was applied, partial encryption of large files leaves a meaningful proportion of intact data pages in the .mdf, allowing page-level damage mapping, repair of system tables and allocation structures, table-by-table extraction, and advancing the recovery point with an undamaged .ldf transaction log plus upstream transaction feeds. If encryption is full, the repair path does not exist and we say so.
Side-channel data last: downstream warehouses, report exports, ETL staging tables and partner reconciliation data often bring the final gap into an acceptable range.
To be explicit: this is repair, not decryption. Coverage is measured per database and per table after testing, and we do not promise "100% recovery".
Why is Weaxor so prevalent now? We had never heard the name.
Because it is recent but spread fast. Weaxor was first identified in late 2024 yet ranked first by domestic infection volume several times in 2025 — 360's reports put it at roughly 40% in January, 35.97% in March, 28.27% in May, 52.24% in June and 38.06% in October. It inherited Mallox's route (brute-forced MS SQL Server credentials) and extended into internet-facing web service vulnerabilities, and China has an enormous population of assets exposed on both counts.
"Never heard the name" is itself the rebrand working as intended: changing the brand and extensions blinds signature- and history-based detection for a while, and victims searching an unfamiliar suffix find nothing useful.
For defenders the point is not to memorise names but to close those two routes: keep database ports off the internet and eliminate weak sa credentials, and inventory internet-facing web services with an emergency patch process for critical vulnerabilities. Do both properly and Weaxor — along with whatever it renames itself to next — cannot get in.
Should we pay the Weaxor ransom?
We do not pay ransoms, do not negotiate for clients, and advise against paying independently. Weaxor carries an extra risk factor: public analysis notes it runs no public leak site and is not an established RaaS brand, with operators tending to be smaller crews targeting exposed servers. Without a brand reputation at stake, the risk of paying and receiving no working decryptor is comparatively higher, and a defective decryptor can inflict further damage on databases.
The pragmatic use of the first 24 to 72 hours: complete containment and remove residual payloads (Weaxor's process injection and AMSI bypass make remnants easy to miss and re-encryption very likely); determine whether the entry point was database brute force or a web vulnerability and close it immediately; inventory every potentially surviving backup, snapshot and secondary replica; and run sample-based repair feasibility on the database files.
In most cases the combined coverage of backups, structural repair, log replay and side-channel copies is far more controllable than betting on an uncertain decryptor.
Sources
- 360:2025 年 10 月勒索软件流行态势分析(Weaxor 居国内感染量首位)
- 360:2025 年 1 月勒索软件流行态势分析
- S-RM: React2Shell used as initial access vector for Weaxor ransomware deployment
- CYFIRMA: Weekly Intelligence Report – 15 Nov 2024(Weaxor 分析)
- PCrisk: Weaxor (.rox) ransomware – removal and decryption
External links are provided for reference only. The content is published by third parties and does not represent our position.
Updated